ZEQ2 Lite

Friday, September 09, 2011

at the botom of my pc screen it says you copy of widnows is not genuine....what should I do!!!!!!!!!
ever time I restart windows its like its saying that it's not my pc...help PLEASE guys

Friday, September 09, 2011

hmmm very familiar

google it,there should be a fix out there

Friday, September 09, 2011

yes,butbefore you even posted that I already fixed it *laughing out loud*...I got so frecking scared

Friday, September 09, 2011

Use Windows XP if you can't handle Win7.

Friday, September 09, 2011

wow *laughing out loud* xp vacuums buttocks

Friday, September 09, 2011

I don't think so. But you need brain or money for Windows 7.

Friday, September 09, 2011

GoldenWarrior wrote : at the botom of my pc screen it says you copy of widnows is not genuine....what should I do!!!!!!!!!
ever time I restart windows its like its saying that it's not my pc...help PLEASE guys

Windows 7 extreme loader lalala..

or

Windows 7 what remover...

had the same problem, resolved it with that.

Friday, September 09, 2011

RemoveWAT

You really should just buy Windows 7, it only costs 100 dollars/euros and you can install it for life..

Also, is this topic a little not done, this is plundering booty..

Friday, September 09, 2011

well I have windows 7 *laughing out loud*

Friday, September 09, 2011

GoldenWarrior wrote : wow *laughing out loud* xp vacuums buttocks

Actually, no. XP has been, and still is, more preferred by people for general computer use(as well as gaming, due to its much lower resource usages) over Vista or 7.

Personally, I dislike both Vista and 7 because they're so bloated with extra features to the point that it bogs down the system, and tools and features are moved around to completely different places(or renamed entirely) compared to earlier versions of Windows, which I don't like having to fight with when I want to change something...

I'm probably one of the only people here who misses(or even remembers, for that matter...) the old DOS days... It takes talent and skill to remember a bunch of strings of commands to use a computer, but any drunken halfwit can point and click things with a oblong shaped hockey puck... You youngsters got it too easy, with your graphical interfaces, 8 gigabytes of RAM, and your terabyte hard disk drives... In my day, we didn't have all that extra space to work with... If we ran out of room on the computer, we stored everything on appetizer plate sized floppy disks(And they really were floppy!)... And we liked it! Spoiled not to my liking whippersnappers... *Shakes a digital cane made of 1s and 0s*

Saturday, September 10, 2011

Actually, no. XP has been, and still is, more preferred by people for general computer use(as well as gaming, due to its much lower resource usages) over Vista or 7.

That's actually incorrect. While what you are saying was 100% true during the first year of Windows 7's release (I refused to adopt it on the same line of thought), it has become the predominantly used windows operating system even by gamers. Service tweaking, driver foundation removing, and other various "tiny windows 7" counterparts exist to make Windows 7 use the same (or less) disk and memory space compared to Windows XP.

Statistical resource and adaptation aside, Windows XP is now considered by many to be a security threat given that even SP3 has been shown quite a large number of vulnerabilities by security analysts.

Technology does press on. While I do agree with you that early or even beginning-stage adoption by Windows 7 was/is foolhardy, it's an inevitability as patches fly out and optimizations clear the runway.

Personally, I dislike both Vista and 7 because they're so bloated with extra features to the point that it bogs down the system, and tools and features are moved around to completely different places(or renamed entirely) compared to earlier versions of Windows, which I don't like having to fight with when I want to change something...

Most of these complaints you mention here actually relate to Vista -- which anyone can tell you was an absolute disaster. Changed shortcuts/hotkeys, moved tools, unnecessary security features, clunky navigation, etc. These were all caveats in Windows Vista -- NOT Windows 7. Windows 7 actually returns to it's XP roots MUCH more as far as familiarity of interface goes.

Save for disabling the UAC and understanding new networking options, there's very little difference after you've done a simple clean of unneeded services.

I'm probably one of the only people here who misses(or even remembers, for that matter...) the old DOS days... It takes talent and skill to remember a bunch of strings of commands to use a computer, but any drunken halfwit can point and click things with a oblong shaped hockey puck... You youngsters got it too easy, with your graphical interfaces, 8 gigabytes of RAM, and your terabyte hard disk drives... In my day, we didn't have all that extra space to work with... If we ran out of room on the computer, we stored everything on appetizer plate sized floppy disks(And they really were floppy!)... And we liked it! Spoiled not to my liking whippersnappers... *Shakes a digital cane made of 1s and 0s*

Hehe. I remember DOS. I actually grew up (ages 9-13) using DOS and (eventually) Windows 3.1. I actually got my start in programming with a little game editor platform known as ZZT (and later the competitive Megazeux).

Memorizing a few console commands isn't really a big deal though, but the entire purpose of having a GUI is simplification of task, after all. If you REALLY want to press console-interfaces as being the "most efficient" and "best" way to get any task done, then you need to be hanging out with the linux zealots.

For those of us with a non-bias head and practical sense of the core CONCEPT of technology or human interface progression, more efficient (not necessarily less featureful!) GUIs are the way to go.

Saturday, September 10, 2011

Yeah, well I have to agree with Shenku that "youngsters" are spoiled with the GUI, but I have seen people like my younger stepbrother who don't even fully understand how to navigate through the computer, though he knows how to move around the internet. It is kind of weird that people know so little about their own computer outside of facebook...

Saturday, September 10, 2011

*laughing out loud*...

Saturday, September 10, 2011

ahh were going off topic..close the topic

Saturday, September 10, 2011

Zeth wrote :
Memorizing a few console commands isn't really a big deal though, but the entire purpose of having a GUI is simplification of task, after all. If you REALLY want to press console-interfaces as being the "most efficient" and "best" way to get any task done, then you need to be hanging out with the linux zealots.

For those of us with a non-bias head and practical sense of the core CONCEPT of technology or human interface progression, more efficient (not necessarily less featureful!) GUIs are the way to go.

Wasn't saying it was better, or more efficient, and I'm certainly not bias to prefering DOS. I was just reminiscing about the "good old days" while attempting to make a point that folks now a days have it too easy.

As for 7, I haven't really messed around with it too much outside of working with it on the school computers, and the IT department locked out a bunch of features and settings on those, so I never really had a chance to play with them much. I have Vista on my laptop though, and absolutely dislike it, even after all the patches and updates... Some things it runs fine, but others, with less demanding requirements, chug for no reason...

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Well, lets move out of the computer world scope as well then. We all have it to easy, considering the life of humans 50-100 years ago (infact you could just go 10-20 years ago as well). I don't see why something that was made to help humans work is designated for spoiling them.

For instance, why do you use a simpler programming language instead of working directly in machine code?
One of the purpose of development is to refine/simplify existing techniques/methods to save time and also make it easy to learn.

Sunday, September 11, 2011

nielsmillikan wrote : Well, lets move out of the computer world scope as well then. We all have it to easy, considering the life of humans 50-100 years ago (infact you could just go 10-20 years ago as well). I don't see why something that was made to help humans work is designated for spoiling them.

For instance, why do you use a simpler programming language instead of working directly in machine code?
One of the purpose of development is to refine/simplify existing techniques/methods to save time and also make it easy to learn.

The only thing kids learn with this development is how to be simple-minded. They don't care what goes on in the background, so long as they can do what they want on the internet whether they have permission to or not.

Sunday, September 11, 2011

it's not development, but wrong guidance/supervision that leads to the problem you stated.

Next time please think and post, instead of just trying to support your old posts.

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Alright, you win...