ZEQ2 Lite

Wednesday, January 09, 2013

I need anwsers....haha I was considering getting a hp sleekbook with a amd a8 if possible option a10 richland apu, but I've heard you can actually replace the apu with most a8 and a10 notebooks? Is this true? And the hp sleek book and hp touchsmart sleek book released don't show if there going to contain the new richland apu or the old trinity apu? And doesn't say what graphics card it will be running...my buddget is around $630 and this laptop seems great, if you guys can please answer me some of those questions.

Wednesday, January 09, 2013

I'm not rich..I dislike rich-land

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Konan wrote : I'm not rich..I dislike rich-land

actually a notebook running amds new richland apu would cost anywhere from $450 to $690

not expenssve at all...

Thursday, January 10, 2013

amd vacuums

Thursday, January 10, 2013

najeeb wrote : amd vacuums

your clearly behind what a apu is meant for and what a intel i7,5,3 are for. amd I feel blows intel away when it comes to battery life/and performance

if you get a notebook with good prformance from intel the battery will be terible, if you get a good battery intel laptop the performance will be terible where as amd all you really need is something that's a quad core/ a A8 or A10 and you should be set as those come with decent performing graphics as well and are hundreads of dollars less just because of the branding. but if your choosing a desktop build ALWAYS go for intel. intel cpus on desktops kick buttocks. but I've tried amds apus and intels 3rd gen and more on laptops and amd win by a lot. and I never had overheating issues with amd like I've had with intel. I personally like both bu believe amd are made for notebooks and tablets that have a little extra graphics power where as intel more of a destop brand or a rich fancy tablet brand...your choice in the end anyway.

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Thers no rule in life about only Intel/Nvidia is the best. Of course because of Physx, CUDA and some other features Nvidia is much flexible but at the same time ATI can make a stronger video card.
AMD has a good side, you can change the voltage, or CPU level in bios. And just because of i7 processor there's no way AMD can't make a better one.

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Konan wrote : Thers no rule in life about only Intel/Nvidia is the best. Of course because of Physx, CUDA and some other features Nvidia is much flexible but at the same time ATI can make a stronger video card.
AMD has a good side, you can change the voltage, or CPU level in bios. And just because of i7 processor there's no way AMD can't make a better one.

Yes yes but here's an example if both amd and intel has a notebook bot h running eith the exact same specifications maybe a i5 vs a amd a10 with same specifications all over same spec graphics and all, the amd would still have so much more battery over the intel, and by changing the voltage you can boid warrenty and stuff and your running the CPU at something it wasn't meant to be run at, plus the amd are apus so that's both CPU and gpi on one die so ule always have a lot more battery life then an intel, I'm saying this is good with notebooks but now with desktops and things like that where nvidia and intel are always going to be on top

Thursday, January 10, 2013

yeah but if I buys an AMD opteron and put four processor on it..than I can rule the world. bwhahaha.
Anyway, long time ago I heard about processor with 64 core..I wondering if that still avaible for home users..I mean than I can run all crysis and far cry at the same time without problem..of course than I need 64 GPU and 64GB RAM but who cares.
Mission improbable, challange accepted!

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Konan wrote : yeah but if I buys an AMD opteron and put four processor on it..than I can rule the world. bwhahaha.
Anyway, long time ago I heard about processor with 64 core..I wondering if that still avaible for home users..I mean than I can run all crysis and far cry at the same time without problem..of course than I need 64 GPU and 64GB RAM but who cares.
Mission improbable, challange accepted!

hahaha go for it man tell me how it turns out

Thursday, January 10, 2013

You are clearly being a fanatical enthusiastic young child and are behind the facts

I know exactly what what I'm saying , but now since you brought the subject about battry life etc etc up now let me state some "FACTS"

1: intel due to its 22 and 28nm designee is much cooler and consumes little power

2: it has the hd 3000 and now 4000 series of integrated graphics in their CPU die

3: A amd quad core A8 or any processor consumes more power than any intel 2nd and 3rd gen cpus and is vastly inferior in terms of both heat production and efficiency which means it is slower

and that proves that intel notebooks has a better life battery , seriously before you go one on one with ME in hard ware discussion you better do your home work

it's not just because of i7 , Amd is still struggling to compete with the 1st gen i7 or i5 when it comes to clock by clock , no wonder they released their latest cpus with 4ghz out of the box , just because the CPU clock by clock is vastly inferior and their 8 core a10 still was only a few points ahead of the 4 year old i7 920 at default 2.66 while the a10 was at 4.2 ghz

Thursday, January 10, 2013

najeeb wrote :

TO EMIRH


You are clearly being a fanatical enthusiastic young child and are behind the facts

I know exactly what what I'm saying , but now since you brought the subject about battry life etc etc up now let me state some "FACTS"

1: intel due to its 22 and 28nm designee is much cooler and consumes little power

2: it has the hd 3000 and now 4000 series of integrated graphics in their CPU die

3: A amd quad core A8 or any processor consumes more power than any intel 2nd and 3rd gen cpus and is vastly inferior in terms of both heat production and efficiency which means it is slower

and that proves that intel notebooks has a better life battery , seriously before you go one on one with ME in hard ware discussion you better do your home work

 TO KONAN

it's not just because of i7 , Amd is still struggling to compete with the 1st gen i7 or i5 when it comes to clock by clock , no wonder they released their latest cpus with 4ghz out of the box , just because the CPU clock by clock is vastly inferior and their 8 core a10 still was only a few points ahead of the 4 year old i7 920 at default 2.66 while the a10 was at 4.2 ghz

hahaha najeeb you're not getting it, an A8 contains more graphics capability then 10 of intels integrated gpu, thus using the same amount of power that's all I'm saying

and please don't call me a hild just just kind of magnificent calling someone a child because they don't like the same CPU as you bahaha that's actually funny as well.

Friday, January 11, 2013

you do realize the a8 CPU consumes such power that you can actually have a decent 6 series low end M gpu along side with you're 3rd gen intel CPU , but disregard that , your statement is again false , in terms of integrated graphics hd4000 is proving to be a major change

marketed as a quad-core processor, the A8-4500M includes only two modules with four integer-cores and two floating-point cores total. As a result, the CPU is not a true quad-core processor.

there fore amd tried to ripp off users who are technically unaware


also I did not call you a child , it's the lacking word filter

Friday, January 11, 2013

najeeb wrote : you do realize the a8 CPU consumes such power that you can actually have a decent 6 series low end M gpu along side with you're 3rd gen intel CPU , but disregard that , your statement is again false , in terms of integrated graphics hd4000 is proving to be a major change

marketed as a quad-core processor, the A8-4500M includes only two modules with four integer-cores and two floating-point cores total. As a result, the CPU is not a true quad-core processor.

there fore amd tried to ripp off users who are technically unaware


also I did not call you a child , it's the lacking word filter

haha okay okay as long asu don't call me a child, I'm talking about the new amd apus coming out like the richland and stuff, intel are good but super exensive and "MOST" of there better cpus drain he battery...do me a favor....find me a good laptop for under $650 that can game please? haha

Friday, January 11, 2013

najeeb wrote : you do realize the a8 CPU consumes such power that you can actually have a decent 6 series low end M gpu along side with you're 3rd gen intel CPU , but disregard that , your statement is again false , in terms of integrated graphics hd4000 is proving to be a major change

marketed as a quad-core processor, the A8-4500M includes only two modules with four integer-cores and two floating-point cores total. As a result, the CPU is not a true quad-core processor.

there fore amd tried to ripp off users who are technically unaware


also I did not call you a child , it's the lacking word filter

the new a10 from amd are at 19w quad cores with a 40% increase from previous generations and I think they use the same sockt as the previous trinity line, if they do use the same socket then I'm thinking of buying a hp sleekbook for like $300 here with only 2gb of ram and a A6 apu 500gb hdd, and buying a new a10 from ebay and I already have ram from my previous laptop, that shuald save me a lot of dollars ay, might wait till the richland CPU comes out so when it does just buy the new cou of ebay and chuck it onto the laptop haha

Friday, January 11, 2013

trust me I am a hardware enthusiast and I'm up to date with the news , there is no such 40% increase in processing speed , Amd piledriver is just as intellectually lacking as buldozer was , and IT IS NOT A QUAD CORE , there are 2 actual cores only , it works like HT model like the i3 but not nearly as efficient


Sure I will find you a good laptop for $650

but what are your needs ? gaming ?

Friday, January 11, 2013

just don't buy a laptop if your going to game with it trust me my laptop burned up because the grafikcard

when I opened my laptop the grafikcard was melt with the laptp shell

in laptops, most graphics cards soldered

Friday, January 11, 2013

Laguna|DaGGeR wrote : just don't buy a laptop if your going to game with it trust me my laptop burned up because the grafikcard

when I opened my laptop the grafikcard was melt with the laptp shell

in laptops, most graphics cards soldered

oh please not you again .... people were running gtx480 sli solutions in laptops and you are crying about you're tragedy

emirh ignore that , read my post before lagunas

Friday, January 11, 2013

Najeeb what happened to your avatar?

Friday, January 11, 2013

Kakarot2550 wrote : Najeeb what happened to your avatar?

your mom , that's what happened

Friday, January 11, 2013

I am going to die of laughing!!





NAJJEB WHY don't YOU JUST MAKE A NEW ONE CALLED AVATAR!!!!!!

Friday, January 11, 2013

good good , now just don't shove a rooster up you're buttocks

Friday, January 11, 2013

najeeb what you think about ATI vs Nvidia?

In my opinion, Nvidia was way better because of flexible driver, Physx(you can't turn it off in some game, some game doesn't start if you don't had and sometomes you can't simulate Physx just by download some fake DLL), CUDA, lot of games use it etc.

Friday, January 11, 2013

najeeb wrote : trust me I am a hardware enthusiast and I'm up to date with the news , there is no such 40% increase in processing speed , Amd piledriver is just as intellectually lacking as buldozer was , and IT IS NOT A QUAD CORE , there are 2 actual cores only , it works like HT model like the i3 but not nearly as efficient


Sure I will find you a good laptop for $650

but what are your needs ? gaming ?

Hmmm, well I talking about a 40% increase from trinity to richland read all abou it around google and what not. and I already sai my budget hahaha about $650 but remember if you can find one with an amazing gpu but a zippy CPU its okay because I could always upgrade he CPU latter when I have the cash

Saturday, January 12, 2013

again the a8 is not a true quadcore , a i3 is a good choice for gaming , more than enough for it , and it consumes so little power that you can have a decent gpu onboard too , so I'll look around

Saturday, January 12, 2013

najeeb wrote : again the a8 is not a true quadcore , a i3 is a good choice for gaming , more than enough for it , and it consumes so little power that you can have a decent gpu onboard too , so I'll look around

it the A6 that's noit a proper quad the a8 and a10 are, hmm yeah that would be great man and I'm sure if something that has an amazing gpu but comes with an i3 can be upgraded to an i7 later on thanks again