ZEQ2.com

Content

<< 1, 2, 3 >>

kaioh_shin_world map

Author	Message
rasengan Gradual Miracle	Sunday, May 22, 2011 Acaryus wrote : This is the one TRL made yes but it's one draw it's not of 3D laughing out loud
TRL	Sunday, May 22, 2011 Nice work rasengan, your texturing talents are growing and growing.
rasengan Gradual Miracle	Sunday, May 22, 2011 thanks trl! ,you are also very good ,I love your palace map
Dokumas Jamaicabronx	Sunday, May 22, 2011 Good Job Rasegan
SAMCROSS	Sunday, May 22, 2011 Update :
rasengan Gradual Miracle	Sunday, May 22, 2011 and that !
Dokumas Jamaicabronx	Sunday, May 22, 2011 slam the sword looks awesome.
mcgrass Beta Trapezoid	Sunday, May 22, 2011 Dokumas wrote : slam the sword looks awesome. Like You could grab it through the monitor... woooow
TRL	Sunday, May 22, 2011 The french dudes are teaming up. It's nice to see. I bet your communication is a lot better than it is with any of us. (because your English vacuums ) I like the sword, but don't be afraid to go wild on shadows, same for the rock, because I don't see any depth in it yet.
Dokumas Jamaicabronx	Sunday, May 22, 2011 TRL your mean Samcross does speak good English Rasengan English vacuums
SAMCROSS	Sunday, May 22, 2011 Here goes another update (In the future there will be another rock under the main one) :
TRL	Sunday, May 22, 2011 Aha, you guys forgot that rocks don't float on water and it was only the tip of the iceberg.
Damaera	Sunday, May 22, 2011 Baldwin wrote : You should take the planets out of the sky texture, and use spheres in the distance. waste of polies
Baldwin Lost Soul	Monday, May 23, 2011 Damaera wrote : Baldwin wrote : You should take the planets out of the sky texture, and use spheres in the distance. waste of polies Have you ever heard of Brushes? :S Also, good job guys! I'd love to export this map! If you don't mind, toss it over and I'll export it, heck if I'm in a good mood, I'll uvmap shadows!
Denz Exploitative / Efficient	Monday, May 23, 2011 uvmap shadows? :S
Baldwin Lost Soul	Monday, May 23, 2011 Denz wrote : uvmap shadows? :S Reference my Tournament Map, look in Tournament Map/Shadow maps, You'll see that the shadows the done manually(Uvmapped)
Dokumas Jamaicabronx	Monday, May 23, 2011 Baldwin wrote : Damaera wrote : Baldwin wrote : You should take the planets out of the sky texture, and use spheres in the distance. waste of polies Have you ever heard of Brushes? :S Also, good job guys! I'd love to export this map! If you don't mind, toss it over and I'll export it, heck if I'm in a good mood, I'll uvmap shadows! You'll export it and never release it like you did with Kame house
Damaera	Monday, May 23, 2011 Baldwin wrote : Damaera wrote : Baldwin wrote : You should take the planets out of the sky texture, and use spheres in the distance. waste of polies Have you ever heard of Brushes? :S Also, good job guys! I'd love to export this map! If you don't mind, toss it over and I'll export it, heck if I'm in a good mood, I'll uvmap shadows! Oh Baldwin.. always have to get your dirty hands on everything. also, what does brushes have to do anything? whether it's made in 3dsmax or that program you use to put collision stuff in, it'll still be a waste of polies. also, do you even know how UV mapping works? you can't even UV map shadows rolling on floor laughing also 3, hai denz! ignore Baldwin, he likes to give the idea that he knows what he's talking about a lot, but he really doesn't. he just sees words that Brad uses and tries to use them to sound smart
Baldwin Lost Soul	Monday, May 23, 2011 Damaera wrote : Baldwin wrote : Damaera wrote : Baldwin wrote : You should take the planets out of the sky texture, and use spheres in the distance. waste of polies Have you ever heard of Brushes? :S Also, good job guys! I'd love to export this map! If you don't mind, toss it over and I'll export it, heck if I'm in a good mood, I'll uvmap shadows! Oh Baldwin.. always have to get your dirty hands on everything. also, what does brushes have to do anything? whether it's made in 3dsmax or that program you use to put collision stuff in, it'll still be a waste of polies. also, do you even know how UV mapping works? you can't even UV map shadows rolling on floor laughing also 3, hai denz! ignore Baldwin, he likes to give the idea that he knows what he's talking about a lot, but he really doesn't. he just sees words that Brad uses and tries to use them to sound smart 10brushes equal's to 1 poly, so it's NOT a "waste of poly", you can even have those planets rotate, just having a planet texture attached to a sky texture, it's like the first generation of Skyboxes, we have the foundation(3Dskyboxes), let's USE it! And yes, you CAN uvmap shadows. I've done it in the tounament map.
Amanda	Monday, May 23, 2011 this looks nice
Zeth The Admin	Monday, May 23, 2011 I think Baldwin is referring to using a either [a] using the existing UV data to bake shadow/lighting data or [b] using a separate independent/unique UV channel exclusively for the same. Since standard UV mapping is more or less just creating a translation space between 2D and 3D, there's absolutely no reason why you couldn't use it for any type of texture data -- including shadows. To go even further in support of the concept, technically, you can use the TEXCOORD data (or ANY vertex attribute in a 3D mesh for that matter) to represent ANYTHING you'd like. TEXCOORD attributes can hold anything from tangent/bitangent values, PRT/LDPRT values for use in dynamic lighting/shadows, physics material data for the mesh, or even custom data relevant to your game (like concentration of energy or softness/sharpness for a region.) If you want to secretly embed a video/image/sound in the unused attributes of your 3D models, there's absolutely nothing stopping you (besides overall space).
rasengan Gradual Miracle	Monday, May 23, 2011 little test of my new tree
Baldwin Lost Soul	Monday, May 23, 2011 Zeth wrote : I think Baldwin is referring to using a either [a] using the existing UV data to bake shadow/lighting data or [b] using a separate independent/unique UV channel exclusively for the same. Since standard UV mapping is more or less just creating a translation space between 2D and 3D, there's absolutely no reason why you couldn't use it for any type of texture data -- including shadows. To go even further in support of the concept, technically, you can use the TEXCOORD data (or ANY vertex attribute in a 3D mesh for that matter) to represent ANYTHING you'd like. TEXCOORD attributes can hold anything from tangent/bitangent values, PRT/LDPRT values for use in dynamic lighting/shadows, physics material data for the mesh, or even custom data relevant to your game (like concentration of energy or softness/sharpness for a region.) If you want to secretly embed a video/image/sound in the unused attributes of your 3D models, there's absolutely nothing stopping you (besides overall space). Exactly.
Damaera	Monday, May 23, 2011 Baldwin wrote : Damaera wrote : Baldwin wrote : Damaera wrote : Baldwin wrote : You should take the planets out of the sky texture, and use spheres in the distance. waste of polies Have you ever heard of Brushes? :S Also, good job guys! I'd love to export this map! If you don't mind, toss it over and I'll export it, heck if I'm in a good mood, I'll uvmap shadows! Oh Baldwin.. always have to get your dirty hands on everything. also, what does brushes have to do anything? whether it's made in 3dsmax or that program you use to put collision stuff in, it'll still be a waste of polies. also, do you even know how UV mapping works? you can't even UV map shadows rolling on floor laughing also 3, hai denz! ignore Baldwin, he likes to give the idea that he knows what he's talking about a lot, but he really doesn't. he just sees words that Brad uses and tries to use them to sound smart 10brushes equal's to 1 poly, so it's NOT a "waste of poly", you can even have those planets rotate, just having a planet texture attached to a sky texture, it's like the first generation of Skyboxes, we have the foundation(3Dskyboxes), let's USE it! And yes, you CAN uvmap shadows. I've done it in the tounament map. It's still a waste of polies if you can make it look nice (nicer) with a properly painted skybox. Also, no, you can't UV map shadows. I'm sure you're referring to bakes, which isn't really considered UV mapping shadows.
Baldwin Lost Soul	Monday, May 23, 2011 Damaera wrote : Baldwin wrote : Damaera wrote : Baldwin wrote : Damaera wrote : Baldwin wrote : You should take the planets out of the sky texture, and use spheres in the distance. waste of polies Have you ever heard of Brushes? :S Also, good job guys! I'd love to export this map! If you don't mind, toss it over and I'll export it, heck if I'm in a good mood, I'll uvmap shadows! Oh Baldwin.. always have to get your dirty hands on everything. also, what does brushes have to do anything? whether it's made in 3dsmax or that program you use to put collision stuff in, it'll still be a waste of polies. also, do you even know how UV mapping works? you can't even UV map shadows rolling on floor laughing also 3, hai denz! ignore Baldwin, he likes to give the idea that he knows what he's talking about a lot, but he really doesn't. he just sees words that Brad uses and tries to use them to sound smart 10brushes equal's to 1 poly, so it's NOT a "waste of poly", you can even have those planets rotate, just having a planet texture attached to a sky texture, it's like the first generation of Skyboxes, we have the foundation(3Dskyboxes), let's USE it! And yes, you CAN uvmap shadows. I've done it in the tounament map. It's still a waste of polies if you can make it look nice (nicer) with a properly painted skybox. Also, no, you can't UV map shadows. I'm sure you're referring to bakes, which isn't really considered UV mapping shadows. It's not about making something look "good" it's about effort.