Content

Post new topic Reply to topic
<<  1, 2, 3, 4

Oppa Gangnam Style

Author Message
TRL View user's profile Send private message

Reply with quote Saturday, October 13, 2012

Hah that avatar.

Totally Oppa

alishan22 View user's profile Send private message

Reply with quote Saturday, October 13, 2012

Now I think I shouldn't have revived this topic...

elektronas View user's profile Send private message

Reply with quote Saturday, October 13, 2012

alishan22 wrote : Now I think I shouldn't have revived this topic...


Well said.

dbz_fan View user's profile Send private message

Reply with quote Sunday, October 14, 2012

yeah let's hope this trash song ends soon, which probably won't.

Buksna Blaizing View user's profile Send private message

Reply with quote Monday, October 15, 2012

dbz_fan wrote : yeah let's hope this trash song ends soon, which probably won't.



How can you call it a trash song when you probably don't even know what's he saying in the song?

Kiddish judging...

Grega Perpetual Traveler View user's profile Send private message

Reply with quote Monday, October 15, 2012

Agreed that's not trash.

Its music. You either like it or you don't like it. But no music is better or worse than any other music.

Alex Al Knows View user's profile Send private message

Reply with quote Monday, October 15, 2012

I actually gave in and watched the video in it's entirity yesterday. I need to Bleach my ears now. It's a genius piece of pop culture but damn I hate it when it gets stuck in my head haha


EDIT: Word filter fail: Bleach does not need to be capitalised when talking about actual Bleach and not the anime >_<

TRL View user's profile Send private message

Reply with quote Monday, October 15, 2012

I dislike to get back on this opinion gangnam style topic, but this video fit the discussion to well not to share it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJLqOclPqis&feature=g-all-bul

Watch it and you might learn something.

Zeth The Admin View user's profile Send private message

Reply with quote Tuesday, October 16, 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJLqOclPqis&feature=g-all-bul

A simplified way of categorizing the interpretation of information process in form-fit steps, but in essence a matter of conclusion deduction and inserting non-bias common sense, Bruno.

In this analogous sense, the ladder type that I was suggesting would theoretically branch to infinite rungs of other ladders entirely. Overload yourself with possibilities and you'll be be less prone to conflicted interests.

Postscript : TED and RSA talks are always highly informational.

TRL View user's profile Send private message

Reply with quote Tuesday, October 16, 2012

I wouldn't say non bias Brad. To me it drove the point that everything we think is generated by bias at first(opinions) and can only be overcome by looking at the other's point of view.

Oh and thanks for mentioning RSA, I didn't know that site yet. Already watched another animated video about the brain. Great.

Zeth The Admin View user's profile Send private message

Reply with quote Tuesday, October 16, 2012

I wouldn't say non bias Brad. To me it drove the point that everything we think is generated by bias at first(opinions) and can only be overcome by looking at the other's point of view.


That's how the common man's thought process is, yes. My point (and the end-cap point on the video) was that this nature of thinking is caused by replication of pattern outcomes and mimicry of expected reactions that (most) people are influenced by in their lives. This is not the only way the thought process works nor the only way it has to be -- as is lightly touched upon postmortem.

The ladder in their example applies primarily to superficial individuals (I.e : the masses) and is not a statically applicable scientific metaphor for those previously elucidated.

<<  1, 2, 3, 4
Post new topic Reply to topic

Actions

Online [ 0 / 6125]