ZEQ2 Lite

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Did you know that 2+2 = 5??
This is how you prove it!
We have,
20 = 20
16-36 = 25-45
Adding (81/4) on both sides,
16-36+(81/4) = 25-45+(81/4)
Using completing square method,
(4^2)-2x4x(9/2)+((9/2)^2) = (5^2)-2x5x(9/2)+((9/2)^2)
(4-9/2)^2 = (5-9/2)^2
Removing square from both sides (Square rooting both sides),
4-9/2 = 5-9/2
2+2=5-9/2+9/2
2+2=5.......proved!

Can anyone find a fault in this calculation???
Ask your maths teacher to do this!

Thursday, November 25, 2010

But you forgot this!

2+2=4

Thursday, November 25, 2010

That means that 4=5 right???
2+2=5
means
4=5!

Thursday, November 25, 2010

That only works if you're from Soviet Russia by the way :p

EDIT: So, 4 = 4+1 ? I have 4 fingers

Thursday, November 25, 2010

ESFER25 wrote : That only works if you're from Soviet Russia by the way :p

EDIT: So, 4 = 4+1 ?

and why is that?

Thursday, November 25, 2010

ESFER25 wrote :
EDIT: So, 4 = 4+1 ? I have 4 fingers

Yep, that's right!
because 4=5!

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Dude this is bul1sh1t
| | | | <- this is 4.
| | | | | <- this is 5.
If I have 4$ and my friend have 5$ so we have the same amount of money right? NO

Thursday, November 25, 2010

divinemaniac wrote : Did you know that 2+2 = 5??
This is how you prove it!
We have,
20 = 20
16-36 = 25-45
Adding (81/4) on both sides,
16-36+(81/4) = 25-45+(81/4)
Using completing square method,
(4^2)-2x4x(9/2)+((9/2)^2) = (5^2)-2x5x(9/2)+((9/2)^2)
(4-9/2)^2 = (5-9/2)^2
Removing square from both sides (Square rooting both sides),
4-9/2 = 5-9/2
2+2=5-9/2+9/2
2+2=5.......proved!

Can anyone find a fault in this calculation???
Ask your maths teacher to do this!

I try to make it like you and I got 2+2=4,7

Thursday, November 25, 2010

medoxas wrote : Dude this is bul1sh1t
| | | | <- this is 4.
| | | | | <- this is 5.
If I have 4$ and my friend have 5$ so we have the same amount of money right? NO

Everyone knows it's not like that maths thing says, it's just a joke -

Thursday, November 25, 2010

divinemaniac wrote : Did you know that 2+2 = 5??
This is how you prove it!
We have,
20 = 20
16-36 = 25-45
Adding (81/4) on both sides,
16-36+(81/4) = 25-45+(81/4)
Using completing square method,
(4^2)-2x4x(9/2)+((9/2)^2) = (5^2)-2x5x(9/2)+((9/2)^2)
(4-9/2)^2 = (5-9/2)^2
Removing square from both sides (Square rooting both sides),
4-9/2 = 5-9/2
2+2=5-9/2+9/2
2+2=5.......proved!

Can anyone find a fault in this calculation???
Ask your maths teacher to do this!

its a math problem it's not like 2+2=5
2+2=5 is just the answer of that problem

ecuation is the word for the problem... I think it is I'm not that good at maths

Thursday, November 25, 2010

I guess you guys may didn't learn this way to finish maths exercises he made it with quartals and dips

if you make it like him you will always get the same number if you learned basic of course like 10+10=20
also divine this here is wrong

he begon with 20/20

so 2+2 isn't 4
because he diped the numbers
2+2=5-9/2+9/2

I get this here when I use your way 2+2=7

Thursday, November 25, 2010

DaGGeR wrote : I get this here when I use your way 2+2=7

How did you get 7 there??
isn't
9/2-9/2=0??
Then 4=5 is the only thing left there!

And guys, this is just a maths joke that seems real....
I haven't found a fault in it! I'm really surprised how thhis is possible!

Thursday, November 25, 2010

divinemaniac wrote :

DaGGeR wrote : I get this here when I use your way 2+2=7

How did you get 7 there??
isn't
9/2-9/2=0??
Then 4=5 is the only thing left there!

And guys, this is just a maths joke that seems real....
I haven't found a fault in it! I'm really surprised how thhis is possible!

found an error in my maths *laughing out loud* its trully 2+2=5

Thursday, November 25, 2010

DaGGeR wrote :
he begon with 20/20

that's not the problem, as 20 == 20!
that's a fact!

Thursday, November 25, 2010

divinemaniac wrote :

DaGGeR wrote :
he begon with 20/20

that's not the problem, as 20 == 20!
that's a fact!

and 4=4 while 5=5,that's a fact!
you can't say 20=20 while 4=5 dude

Thursday, November 25, 2010

cjice5959 wrote :

divinemaniac wrote :

DaGGeR wrote :
he begon with 20/20

that's not the problem, as 20 == 20!
that's a fact!

and 4=4 while 5=5,that's a fact!
you can't say 20=20 while 4=5 dude

But 20=20 was before 4=5, so I can say that!

Thursday, November 25, 2010

let x = 2+2
[multiply by x-1] x(x-1)=(2+2)(x-1)
x^2 -x = 2x+2x-2-2
[subtract 3x] x^2-4x=x-4
[multiply by x-5] (x-5)(x^2-4x)=(x-5)(x-4)
x^3-9x^2+20x=x^2-9x+20
x(x-4)(x-5)=(x-4)(x-5)
[divide by x-4] x^2-5x=x-5
[add 4x] x^2-x=5x-5
x(x-1)=5(x-1)
[divide by (x-1)] x=5

And we started with x=2+2, therefore 2+2=5

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Acirya wrote : 2+2=5

this is a conspiracy

Thursday, November 25, 2010

divinemaniac wrote : Did you know that 2+2 = 5??
This is how you prove it!
We have,
20 = 20
16-36 = 25-45
Adding (81/4) on both sides,
16-36+(81/4) = 25-45+(81/4)
Using completing square method,
(4^2)-2x4x(9/2)+((9/2)^2) = (5^2)-2x5x(9/2)+((9/2)^2)
(4-9/2)^2 = (5-9/2)^2
Removing square from both sides (Square rooting both sides),
4-9/2 = 5-9/2
2+2=5-9/2+9/2
2+2=5.......proved!

Can anyone find a fault in this calculation???
Ask your maths teacher to do this!

there is a error , find out you're self

Thursday, November 25, 2010

najeeb wrote :

divinemaniac wrote : Did you know that 2+2 = 5??
This is how you prove it!
We have,
20 = 20
16-36 = 25-45
Adding (81/4) on both sides,
16-36+(81/4) = 25-45+(81/4)
Using completing square method,
(4^2)-2x4x(9/2)+((9/2)^2) = (5^2)-2x5x(9/2)+((9/2)^2)
(4-9/2)^2 = (5-9/2)^2
Removing square from both sides (Square rooting both sides),
4-9/2 = 5-9/2
2+2=5-9/2+9/2
2+2=5.......proved!

Can anyone find a fault in this calculation???
Ask your maths teacher to do this!

there is a error , find out you're self

that's what I talked about I got 2+2=7 *laughing out loud*

Thursday, November 25, 2010

najeeb wrote :

divinemaniac wrote : Did you know that 2+2 = 5??
This is how you prove it!
We have,
20 = 20
16-36 = 25-45
Adding (81/4) on both sides,
16-36+(81/4) = 25-45+(81/4)
Using completing square method,
(4^2)-2x4x(9/2)+((9/2)^2) = (5^2)-2x5x(9/2)+((9/2)^2)
(4-9/2)^2 = (5-9/2)^2
Removing square from both sides (Square rooting both sides),
4-9/2 = 5-9/2
2+2=5-9/2+9/2
2+2=5.......proved!

Can anyone find a fault in this calculation???
Ask your maths teacher to do this!

there is a error , find out you're self

My question would be. Why did you pull X out of yer buttocks in the middle of the equation *intense laughter*

And no I don't know that one. I only used to know the 2=1 thing.

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Grega wrote : My question would be. Why did you pull X out of yer buttocks in the middle of the equation *intense laughter*

And no I don't know that one. I only used to know the 2=1 thing.

can you remember that one Grega? I'd like to know that one as well *intense laughter*

Thursday, November 25, 2010

And dividing by zero will always work right?

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Something like this

Z = X (X = Z simple as that)
Z + Z = X + Z (Add Z to both sides and the equation should still be correct)
2Z = X + Z (Z + Z = 2Z obvious enough)
2Z - 2X = X + Z - 2X (Same as step 2 only subtract 2X)
2(Z - X) = Z - X (put the 2 out in front of the left side, and simply X -2X = -X on the right)
2 = 1 (the result after you devide the equation with Z - X)

There you go 2 = 1


Offcourse there is a little cheat in there. See if you can find it *intense laughter*

The letter before X is filtered what the heck Pressing the button makes it a "Why" O.O

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Actually, the initial equation simply looks like an elongated process to produce a rounding error by offsetting incremental fractional values and applying squaring/rooting operations.