najeeb
My Sir
|
 Tuesday, April 02, 2013
bad choice of words and miss interception too
it's not war against every one , they are just "preparing them selves" against the american propaganda against them , and America supporting south korea and sticking its nose up their matter like its usual self
"Question:
Why is USA trying to prevent countries from achieving the same military power they have. If by any chance the America has no potential to advance and keep in top than it should stand back and let others do the trick. You started this, by pushing sanctions to them. They only wanted the same weapon you have.... "
I fully support the guy who posted that in the comments section
THE ARTICLE IS FULL OF BULL stuff
|
Shenku
RiO Incarnate
|
Tuesday, April 02, 2013
najeeb wrote : "Question:
Why is USA trying to prevent countries from achieving the same military power they have. If by any chance the America has no potential to advance and keep in top than it should stand back and let others do the trick. You started this, by pushing sanctions to them. They only wanted the same weapon you have.... "
I fully support the guy who posted that in the comments section
THE ARTICLE IS FULL OF BULL stuff
The issue isn't that we(the US) don't want other countries to have the same weapons we have, it's that we don't want crazy genocidal dictators who preach war death and destruction to have nuclear weapons that they've already threatened to use once they get them regardless of the consequences.
And that's not propaganda, that's the truth.
|
TRL
|
Tuesday, April 02, 2013
Besides the point that North Korea will probably never have anything that can even reach Alaska, this really isn't about America.
There are united nations trade embargos against any country that even so much thinks of developing nuclear bombs. And this is because of the non-proliferation pact that was created long ago so that the two world super powers in Russia and the United States wouldn't get any more and wouldn't be likely to kill the whole world in the process. This keeps things in balance. The question why doesn't each side just destroy them all then is just naieve.
The biproduct of this is that Russia and America will remain having this ultimate trump card and other countries will have to keep being afraid. It also vacuums that because of the "assured mutual destruction" russia and us only ever make war through proxy anymore. Like what happened in Korea and Vietnam way back. This is why it was called the "Cold War" because the two actual sides weren't even fighting eachother.
|
|
najeeb
My Sir
|
Thursday, April 04, 2013
TRL wrote : Besides the point that North Korea will probably never have anything that can even reach Alaska, this really isn't about America.
The biproduct of this is that Russia and America will remain having this ultimate trump card and other countries will have to keep being afraid. It also vacuums that because of the "assured mutual destruction" russia and us only ever make war through proxy anymore. Like what happened in Korea and Vietnam way back. This is why it was called the "Cold War" because the two actual sides weren't even fighting eachother.
bold statement there TRL , we have no idea what they might or might not have and where it may reach
also during the cold war era it was the height of Pakistan and USA alliance and our military was used to eliminate any Russian influence in the Afghanistan .
consequences of Pakistan's engagement in the Cold War from several perspectives. What were the pushes and pulls that brought Pakistan to the point where its leaders liked to boast (especially to Americans) that it was the 'most allied' of American allies? What were the American and Biscuits motives in bringing Pakistan into their orbit? What were the political, economic, and ideological consequences of Pakistan's participation in the Western alliance system, notably on the very identity of the Pakistani state? Finally, what are the lessons? Since Pakistan's incentives for joining the alliance system were largely India-oriented, what has been the impact on India and the region?
the thing is weather you believe it or not , most other countries believe its a propaganda created to stay in power by not letting other countries to develop nuclear powers , as soon as Pakistan did , USA turned its back towards us regardless of what we did for them in the coldwar
|
|
Shenku
RiO Incarnate
|
Thursday, April 04, 2013
There's a lot more to it than that, Najeeb, but suffice to say that the reason that the US is so against the idea of handing out nuclear technology to other countries is, simply put, we saw the destructive power of them first hand. There is a reason that nuclear weapons haven't been used since World War 2, and there's a reason that the US and Russia have been on such shaky ground when it comes to nukes, and it all comes down to 3 words that other countries don't always seem to process.
Mutually assured destruction. The idea was, during the cold war, Russia and the US had nukes coming out of every possible place, and they could be targeted at nearly any location, and the end realization was that if Russia launched, the US would launch as well, Russia would see this and launch more, then the US would launch more, until the point at which enough nukes would have been launched to completely wipe out 90% of life on the earth's surface from initial blasts, and the rest would slowly die from radiation poisoning, lack of sunlight killing off crops, livestock, exc. and basically the world would just choke on the aftermath.
Which brings us back to why we don't want North Korea to have nukes. Quite simply put, whether they have them already or not, they're saying they'll use them. If you're curious how that might turn out, revisit the Mutually Assured Destruction scenario of the US and Russia. Point blank, everyone would die.
I don't know about you, but I'm not done living yet to want some crazy dictator with Napoleon complex to acquire nuclear arms...
|
